I guess this means I'm getting old...

David R. Busse

Well-known member
NPR today reported the 30th anniversary of the Supreme Court's Bakke decision. This was the landmark ruling that disallowed racial quotas for college admission.

Politics aside, it was a landmark ruling in my life.

"Reaction to Bakke decision..." was the first story I ever shot on ENG. I'd been with WAVE-TV, Louisville, for about a month and was dispatched with reporter John Rawlins and producer Linda Broadus to the University of Louisville for the local angle. The story came down at mid-day during a busy day in our newsroom. I had been doing 1-2 hours of training on ENG and was promised that my first field assignment would be something easy and simple, on a slow day.

We news people know what a hollow promise that usually turns out to be.

I was sent out the door with a TK-76A, a couple of 3/4" tapes and an ancient Sony BVU-100 tape deck.

As I recall, we had an interview with a university official. UofL had a very pretty campus with a distinctive administration building. As we drove up, I suggested to reporter and producer that we "bring the guy outside." I wasn't being lazy--I simply suggested the interview would look more collegiate sitting across the campus with the admin building and white columns behind him, out of focus, with lav mics and the "network look.". It looked great and I soon realized this theory of making the interview look like a portrait was something my mentor Leigh Wilson had taught me at Mizzou and was something they'd never heard at WAVE before.

We shot campus stuff and went over to the medical school, where we shot students in a biology lab. I remember being blown-away by the ability of the TK76 viewfinder to be oriented for odd-angle shots and the "what you see is what you get" business about shooting ENG.

(Remember--I had never touched an ENG camera until this day. I was a film shooter).

I don't recall being nervous until we got back to the station. I had fiddled with the edit system about 15 minutes before this assignment, so our news e.p., Pat Trapf (a very good editor in her own right) sat down and edited the story.Somewhere in my garage, I still have a 3/4" tape of the finished product.

It was a good story on the air and my boss, the late Larry Pond, accused me good-heartedly of having lied about my inexperience with ENG.

For the remaining two years of my Louisville experience, I tried to shoot ENG whenever possible.

Now, exactly 30 years later, I'm a week away from abandoning my Betacam SX camera and starting two weeks of training on Panasonic P2 tapeless cameras and Edius non-linear editing.

Has it been 30 years? Naaah....
 
It is amazing what can happen in such a short amount of time. I have has my P2 for a week now, and have access to Edius as well. We will be installing the edit bays soon. Imagine what the next 30 years will bring.
 
Look at it this way big Dave...

You and many others including myself, were here when news was news and journalists were relatively respected and allowed to do their jobs without being hassled by police, fire, & ems tugboats. You earned your way to P2. There is a certain nostalgic look in the eyes of guys like you who paved the way for all the rest. Times have changed, gear has changed, news has changed. Good, solid, hard working, decent people don't change all that much. You can see proof of that right here on this site. You earned your place and hopefully those who need to learn how to conduct themselves will follow the lead of guys like you.
 
so many changes

a reporter, a shooter, and a field producer in a thirty-something market? and I bet all of you had a few years' experience too... that really WAS a long time ago. today it'd be some 22-year-old by himself carrying a handycam with everything set on auto... excuse me, I should say it'd be an aggressive young backpack journalist on the bleeding edge of technology, shattering the arbitrary restrictions of traditional news production...

(in '78 I was shooting film in a market a lot smaller than Louisville... didn't get an ENG camera till a couple years later & then it was a Sony 1600, two-wheeled cart and all.)
 
Not to rain on your parade but just a warnig Busse....hope you're ready for the headaches of Edius.....can't tell you how many times in the past year and a half I've wanted to put my head thru a wall becuase of that software.
 
Not to rain on your parade but just a warnig Busse....hope you're ready for the headaches of Edius.....can't tell you how many times in the past year and a half I've wanted to put my head thru a wall becuase of that software.

I work with Edius. lol. It's not SO bad.
 
Not to rain on your parade but just a warnig Busse....hope you're ready for the headaches of Edius.....can't tell you how many times in the past year and a half I've wanted to put my head thru a wall becuase of that software.

Yikes! Heard that before.

BTW--you gonna be at Mtn. Pass in the morning? Seeya there...
 
Dave, I'm with ya there. It was thirty years ago this year that I started shooting
ENG with that very same TK-76 and BVU-100. I also had a film background and
the first thing I did with the TK was of course a live-shot. We were still shooting
film as well and although the TK-76 coupled with the 100 were a beastly combination,
it was pretty easy to see the advantages it had over film for sheer speed. The fact that you didn't have to wait for film processing alone made it a major plus. But man, did it need a lot of light. I only wish I had a picture of myself when I had a battery belt on for the camera, a battery belt on for the colortran "Port-o-lite",
and of course the TK and the 100 in tow. If I had ever fallen in any amount of water, I would have sunk like a anvil. I remember our engineers finally rigged up
one of the first anton-bauer battery systems on that TK and at least eleminated
a belt to run it.
A little story about my third day on the job with the TK. We ran a two man crew
on "The Nightbeat" back then, one guy to help grip while the other shot and then we'd switch up. We traveled in a live truck, so of course we went live...a lot!
Anyway, on my third day on the job, we we're setting up at the airport to do a live about a cab strike. I'm setting up the shot with the reporter while Don, my partner
was in the truck getting the signal in and doing communications. Well, I frame up
Jim Jaggers, (yes, For anyone from Memphis, the very same Jaggers that's still in that market I think, doing the weather), and I think I have a pretty good shot.
Jim starts his live and not more than 10 seconds in, Don comes out of the truck and grabs Jim by the arm and physically tries to move him over. Jim of course freaks,
turns to Don, and tells him, "Don, I'm on the air". Don of course retreats and I'm behind the camera wondering what the f**k just happened. Well after we get this
disaster of a hit over with, Don explains that he didn't know we were on the air and that he was repositioning Jaggers in the frame so that the always annoying "live"
super wouldn't be plastered across his face. Of course, to the viewing audience, it looked like some long-haired guy in an army jacket had tried to accost Jim during a live-shot. We get back to the station and of course our News Director, Don Stevens, (an old veteran back then of the news business), calls us all in his office.
My first thought is that I'm going to be fired my third day out. Anyway, we all sit down and Mr Stevens yells out, "What in the Hell was that"?. Don quickly fesses
up and tells his side. To my surprise, We all get off with a stern, "Don't let me see that happen again" line. It was a good thought, but given the unpredictability and of course, the
frequency of the live-shot, things like that happen....again.:D
 
Not so bad?

I work with Edius. lol. It's not SO bad.

Well...tell me that after entire projects get deleted....or freezes (when they say it won't)....and it erases your story and its 15 mins to air....or after a million keyboard combinations creates a virus that starts to attack itself...and your archiving stores....all that and more.

Maybe you haven't used it that long to experience any of this or you don't edit so much like we do here.

Good program but I don't think its news friendly...but thats my opinion. A local station here has a suit pending against edius....shows you how NOT so bad it is.
 
I've got $10 that says your two weeks of training lasts less than two days.

I'll take that bet, but add that I think it'll only last a day and a half:

At the end of the second day, a frenzied reporter or assignment editor will grab him by the arm and say, "Are you trained yet? Can I send you to a breaker? Seriously -- are you trained yet?"
 
First used one of these back in high school at the local community TV channel in 1979.

Sony 3800, note there are no XLR connectors only mini jacks.

Can't remember the model camera we had it was a JVC with an external CCU and separate power supply.

umatic3800side.gif
 
I'm not that comfortable about talking about another man's deck... but there ain't no way of denying it.

Some guys just have big decks.


:eek:
 
Last edited:
First used one of these back in high school at the local community TV channel in 1979.

Sony 3800, note there are no XLR connectors only mini jacks.

Can't remember the model camera we had it was a JVC with an external CCU and separate power supply.

umatic3800side.gif

One of my first road trips was to a SEC Basketball tournament with one of these piece of crap monsters (even for 1979) along with a TK-76. Since the TK ran on belts that had no more than 20 minutes of run time (on a good day) I had to run on AC at the court to save the belts for post. The AC box for the TK was nearly as large as the deck, not to mention having to run a extention cord from a random AC outlet near the court. It wasn't fun explaining all of this to the arena folks....they didn't like it one bit.

I won't even get into what it took to get the editing done. But we were HI TECH!!!
 
Last edited:
BVU-100_009.jpg


The BVU-100 was the upgraded "broadcast version" of the 3800. It had the XLR
inputs. It weighed as much I believe as the 3800. It was a beast to carry as a
one man thing...even more than the 110 I always thought. Since us old farts are going down memory lane, does anyone remember the trick of bouncing a bvu-50 on it's bottom to get the thing to thread the tape when it decided it didn't want to...
or unthread when it jammed. How about the old humid light that would usually go on at a crucial moment when you needed to shoot something,
It usually took a hair dryer to get it working again. Or if you're real creative, a
large vent from the car with the fan on high. How about hot starting the record from the BVU-50 deck using a bnc cable when your 26 pin cable invariably went bad, and
you didn't have a back-up handy. You youngsters don't know the fun you missed
trying to keep those old "beasts" running in the field. I'd love to get all this old gear together again and just see how much weight we we're actually dealing with. My back is hurting just thinking about it.:eek:
 
tk76-kutv.jpg


This is the best photo I could find that illustrates what all we had to carry to shoot and light this thing.
This poor guy at least has a grip for the deck. On weekends, I would shoot the thing by myself
so I could learn ENG faster and to also give me more time in the field versus shooting a CP-16
film camera with a 2:30 pm cut-off time due to processing. There's a website that celebrates the
30th anniversary of the TK with pictures submitted from all over the world of people using them back in the day. Check it out. It's a trip. www.oldradio.com/archives/hardware/TV/RCA.
 
2 weeks to train on the P2? Wow what a dream... I got mine handed to me and therre you go. Transitioning from DVC I figured getting stuff into the camera was pretty much the same Panasonic stuff, it was just getting it out that worried me. A quick 5 min crash course from another staffer who had been on P2 for a while and away I went. I think you'll like the transition. I can't speak for the edit system, we are Avid. I will say with our laptop editing and the P2 it is amazing how fast things have become. For Twins opening day we were able to just set up the laptop at our live shot position get various video/sound etc. and between hits cut it and using the firewire connection feed straight out of the Avid via the firewire connection of the P2 and up the line. Previously we would have to run up to the DVC deck in the truck, cut, feed and run back down to the liveshot position.

Enjoy the newest transition... and Go Tigers! (Another mafia member!)
 
I've got $10 that says your two weeks of training lasts less than two days.

Well, I'm not one of the first to go thru the training, and everyone else has "graduated" depending on how well they did getting the "feel" of the new stuff. Some took longer, others did it faster. There have been bugs--just like there are in any new technical systems--but overall, it seems like a real interesting transition. I can't say enough good things about the way our engineering department has organized the transition and the teaching process.

Keep in mind that there are two things happening during the training process. While the individual shooters are in "class," engineers are busy downstairs converting the shooter's assigned ENG truck to the new system. So, in theory, after the classwork is done, the "student" goes downstairs and starts hands-on with his or her vehicle, getting to know all the nuances of the system in that particular vehicle. This is also the time when "phase three" of the training really kicks in--field troubleshooting.

I'll keep you posted on my progress. I'll actually undergo a second round of transition training after the satellite trucks get converted later this year.
 
Back
Top