MrHasselblad
Member
WPXI (Pittsburgh NBC market) has recently been observed as participating in falsely advertising themselves when promoting their own station and newscasts; specifically certain claims made directly by one of their weather staff- Julie.
In one of the stations promotional advertisements Julie specifically states that she is a lifelong resident. Does she mean the Pittsburgh region? Or could it be of the United States? If it is indeed the U.S. then the statement is indeed accurate. If she is infering that it might be the Pittsburgh region; then the facts tend to show otherwise.
As the WPXI website specifically shows that Julie is not a lifelong Pittsburgh resident.
What exactly is going on at the station? Did this promotional advertisement manage to completely slip through any type of review process? What happened to editing for content or management oversight? Even after weeks of airing the advertisement has nobody still caught it?
The station has been informed of their series of errors by telephone, email, and written letter; all with no return reply.
Given the facts of the issue, and also that it is a station promoting itself; doesn't this clearly qualify as false advertising?
This also shows to the character and credability of both the (entire) station and specifically Julie.
In one of the stations promotional advertisements Julie specifically states that she is a lifelong resident. Does she mean the Pittsburgh region? Or could it be of the United States? If it is indeed the U.S. then the statement is indeed accurate. If she is infering that it might be the Pittsburgh region; then the facts tend to show otherwise.
As the WPXI website specifically shows that Julie is not a lifelong Pittsburgh resident.
What exactly is going on at the station? Did this promotional advertisement manage to completely slip through any type of review process? What happened to editing for content or management oversight? Even after weeks of airing the advertisement has nobody still caught it?
The station has been informed of their series of errors by telephone, email, and written letter; all with no return reply.
Given the facts of the issue, and also that it is a station promoting itself; doesn't this clearly qualify as false advertising?
This also shows to the character and credability of both the (entire) station and specifically Julie.