Okay,
Here is the deal. For network news shoots, I am still using a Panasonic HDX900 with a Nano Flash, mainly due to it's 2/3 inch sensor.
I also still have a Panasonic HPX370 1/3 inch sensor camera, but with a top of the line 1/3 inch lens with a doubler. I use it for any FOX news/sports shoots and for local affiliates. Otherwise, I use the 900 for network.
The problem is, if I do a P2 gig, I'm stuck with the smaller CMOS chips, so lower image quality, than from the HDX900.
I could sell the 370 and 900 on Ebay and get MAYBE 5-6K all together. But, then I would have to buy a used or b-stock 2/3 inch P2 camera, such as an HPX3100 or HPX600, so I would have to invest some money back in.
Would it be worth even staying with P2? I also have a Canon C300, and I feel like a lot of content is leaning more towards large sensors, such as the C300 and Sony FS7.
Here is the deal. For network news shoots, I am still using a Panasonic HDX900 with a Nano Flash, mainly due to it's 2/3 inch sensor.
I also still have a Panasonic HPX370 1/3 inch sensor camera, but with a top of the line 1/3 inch lens with a doubler. I use it for any FOX news/sports shoots and for local affiliates. Otherwise, I use the 900 for network.
The problem is, if I do a P2 gig, I'm stuck with the smaller CMOS chips, so lower image quality, than from the HDX900.
I could sell the 370 and 900 on Ebay and get MAYBE 5-6K all together. But, then I would have to buy a used or b-stock 2/3 inch P2 camera, such as an HPX3100 or HPX600, so I would have to invest some money back in.
Would it be worth even staying with P2? I also have a Canon C300, and I feel like a lot of content is leaning more towards large sensors, such as the C300 and Sony FS7.