View Full Version : video web
do you know any website with very good image quality in their videos?
what camera do you think is the best for this kind of work?
:confused:
Camopz
09-12-2003, 08:50 PM
It depends are you talking about live webcasts
or video uploaded to a site
Serious live webcasts are shot to broadcast standards, with broadcast equipment, and uplinked.
The only difference is that it is being webcasted at the end of the chain.
(fast movement,zooms and pans are at a mimimum because of the web thing though)
<batman>
09-12-2003, 09:15 PM
try this one:
http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/israel.palestine/
The new season of Frontline-World was made with Sony DSR-PD150, "a new generation of video journalists"..."to digitize the video into Final Cut Pro and then use Media Cleaner Pro 6 to output both RealVideo sizes. Media Cleaner makes everything pretty easy and fast. We might have to fiddle with cropping and coloring slightly depending on the clip but generally as long as we get a good version of the tape it’s pretty easy.”
Videosystems magazine
http://videosystems.com/ar/video_dv_journeys/index.htm#sidebar1
It depends are you talking about live webcasts or video uploaded to a site
video uploaded to a site? :confused:
<warlock>
09-12-2003, 09:29 PM
GY-DV300U with web adapter KD-V300U allows you to broadcast live in MPEG-4
some journalists in iraq made live and recorded broadcast with canon GL2
www.washingtonpost.com,www.witness.org,www (http://www.washingtonpost.com,www.witness.org,www)
<newscam>
09-12-2003, 09:35 PM
some porno sites have excellent video quality,seriously, they use vx2000 and XL1 even better than many news sites.
<Veema>
09-12-2003, 11:08 PM
A lot has been made about the Washington Post.com video journalists. Their work can be seen at the Post's "Camera Works" section of the website. They just got a nice write-up in Videography magazine, and have won a lot of White House Press Photographers Association awards. All their stories are tailored for web-delivery. They shoot on PD-150s and XL-1s I believe, shooting in 16 x 9. The Real Media compression/encoding looks good and is a nice addition to the website. That said, while I've been impressed by a couple of the pieces, some of them are pretty ordinary- not meaning bad, but also not meaning exceptionally good, especially considering how much time they get to work on some of the pieces.
Lil' Photog
09-13-2003, 03:59 PM
Anyone see ESPN's new deal at espn.com
I don't know what technology they are using for that motion stuff but it looks sharp. What is it based in? How do they do it?
you're right, it looks good...
:cool:
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.